Extended Critical Response Final Draft

The add up of wo employ force who join or even be a part of science cerebrate to fields, argon few and the percentages argon threatening over time. The question is why? wherefore atomic number 18nt wo manpower pursuing c bers in these fields? The combination of classs in society and the lack of preparation on this matter is the answer. They get in the way of a womans judg handst and choices. This is the personal credit line that the word The Persistence of G rester Myths in Math by Roseland Chat Barnett & take Rivers published in October 2004, in the report Education Week contains.I mindably am in favor of Barnett and Rivers position. Not further because they argon against the stamp which is implanted in our society, that math is only suitable for men scarcely also because they intrust that if women where aright tamed without diagonal they could achieve things they are capable of instead of being discourage. To support my views on this matter go away be usi ng evidence from other sources that go away be presented later on. One primer coat I agree with Barnett and Rivers is because on angiotensin converting enzyme hand although they acknowledge the fact that men far out number women in math related fields (par. , on the other hand they argue that this has zero point to do with innate differences but sooner with stereotypes. In other words the pens do not believe that genes are the reason why women do not read to study math but are preferably deterred from biased people and slew which discourage women in wining in these fields. When girls grow up in an purlieu which is biased and supports that men are disclose than women in jobs or math related studies and avert them from doing the analogous they will end up believing that men are break off than them and that erodes their confidence in their testify ability to succeed (par. . In homelike English when a girl has been discouraged throughout her life from doing cometh inning that is considered inapplicable to her gender she will not put on confidence in achieving a finishing and she will believe that she IS not good. It will always enterm hard, even if she has the potency of achieving it. Moreover, I could not agree to a greater extent with Barnett and Rivers that nicety has convinced them that girls dont belong in these fields (par. 0), because a biased culture and the influence of stereotypes may avert girls from choosing what they are good at but earlier choose what they are mostly suitable for. But doesnt culture consist of reading and family? On one hand the article Reinforcing intimate activity Stereotypes How Our Schools Narrow Childrens Choices by genus Athene Donald published in January 2014 in the newspaper The Guardian the author supports that the reason girls are not interested in manlier subjects is not due to innate differences but propaganda in school.As Donald puts it children learn sexism at school. Barnett and Rivers are Of t he equivalent mind. They believe that teachers do not elevate girls in choosing courses that are much(prenominal) popular with boys. On the other hand, Steven Pinker the author of The Science of Difference published in February 2005, in the newspaper The New body politic talks about this topic in a more psychological hazard and is a firm supporter that biology has to do with what we like (nature), but part agrees with Barnett and Rivers that peoples preferences are caused by their social purlieu (nurture).This is where family comes in. When the author says children are born unisex and are molded into male and distaff roles by their parents it shows us that children grow the same abilities in achieving things but society is what teaches kids that military personnel are different due to their ex, which applies, to my beliefs as well as Barnett and Rivers. The authors of The Persistence of Gender Myths in Math offer a issue, which think is reasonable.A combination of teac hers helping kids in the school environment and enhancing the girls natural talents earlier than eliminating them because they dont apply to their sex and the elimination of bias from our society, is what the authors believe to be the solution. Firstly, they believe that teachers notify contribute to their female students and help them believe that they are equally likely to succeed in the fields of math. To do so, the educators lease to examine the degree to which they themselves may have unconsciously- accepted the math-male equation (par. 1). Agree with the authors because, since teachers are the ones who have a part of modelling a childs personality they need to educate themselves too on this subject. Children cannot be rely with a teacher who does not encourage them equally. Moreover, I could not agree more with Barnett and Rivers when they say that when we stop believing in the stereotype that men are better that women at math and finally see that it has nothing to do w ith innate differences (par. ) but rather judge correctly a human and his capabilities by their individual merits rather than the statistics of their group (Pinker par. 6) that is when we will have a clear conception of each individuals capabilities disrespect of their sex. TO sum up, I am a firm supporter of Barnett and Rivers, because they are of the same mind as me which is that achievement in math has nothing to do with sexual characteristics but this is our societys false belief that men can do better in math fields.The consequence of which, ends up alter women negatively, it does let them acknowledge their own abilities and beckon in these fields. Moreover, the authors do not pay idly towards this topic but slide by in offering a solution in eliminating this bias specifically in the school environment, which is that educators should eliminate this inhabited stereotype so they can judge the abilities of their students in math, based on their performance and not tally to their sex which will entrust in encouraging them equally.Finally, a stereotype cannot stand in the way of a womans pursuit of her dreams just because her sex according to statistics does not do well in math. All humans despite of their ex, be the same encouragement and support in achieving their goals, so its time for society to work off this bias and judge equally peoples achievements rather than having a false idea of womens capabilities.